"Should the U.S. have attacked Iraq?"

April 24, 2008 - 2:11pm by Princess206
This is a retarded question because I think that everyone knows that the U.S shouldn't have attacked Iraq. Bush made a stupid excuse about how the people that were involved with the 9/11 were from Iraq when really in the beginning they said that the people involved were from Saudi Arab and from Afgnistan and then later switched it up so that why would have an excuse to attack Iraq. Over the Iraq war we have lost so money, soldiers and yea we gained some money and some gas but I don’t believe that it was worth it especially killing so many innocent people from Iraq when they didn't even know what was going so instead of going after Osama Bin Laden Bush became too focused on Killing Sadam Hussein and taking over Iraq.

 In one of the articles I read it states “528 U.S. troops have died in the war, including three so far this month. The worst month was November, when 82 died. In October there were 43, September had 30, August 35” Is it really worth it for people to be dying like that just to steal some oil from another country? I personally believe that it’s not fair and we should to do something about it.

Causes: